In Union County, South Carolina, the cotton mills that once supplied many jobs have vanished. Now, the county is labeled as a “food desert,” indicating residents are often distant from grocery stores. Acknowledging this challenge, local non-profit leader Elise Ashby initiated a project in 2016, working with farmers to deliver affordable boxes of fresh fruits and vegetables across the area, where around 30% of the population is Black, and about 25% face poverty.
At first, Ms. Ashby supported the project using her own savings and modest grants. Nonetheless, in 2023, her work gained considerable momentum when the Walmart Foundation—the charitable arm of a major national corporation—awarded her organization more than $100,000 (£80,000). This financial backing was included in a larger $1.5 million program designed to assist “community-focused non-profits led by individuals of color.”
“It brought me to tears,” she confessed. “It was one of those instances when you understand that someone genuinely recognizes and appreciates your efforts.”
Only two years ago, initiatives like this were extensively supported by leading businesses throughout the U.S., as the nation came to terms with systemic racism following the 2020 killing of George Floyd, a Black man who lost his life under the knee of a police officer in Minneapolis.
Yet, several of these companies are now withdrawing from those pledges. In November, Walmart revealed it would end certain diversity programs, including the closure of its Center for Racial Equity, which had played a key role in providing Ms. Ashby’s grant.
Companies such as Meta, Google, Goldman Sachs, and McDonald’s have all made similar moves, reflecting a broader corporate pullback from diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives.
This transition signifies a significant cultural shift, partly fueled by concerns over potential legal issues, regulatory examination, and negative reactions on social media—pressures intensified by the current U.S. president.
Since assuming office in January, Donald Trump has vigorously sought to dismantle DEI initiatives, promoting a return to “merit-based opportunity” in the United States. He has directed the federal government to abolish DEI programs and initiate investigations into private companies and academic institutions suspected of participating in “unlawful DEI practices.”
During the initial months of his second term, the Department of Veterans Affairs shut down its DEI offices, the Environmental Protection Agency put almost 200 civil rights staff on paid leave, and Trump replaced the nation’s top military general—a Black man—after his defense secretary had previously implied he should be dismissed due to his ties with “woke” DEI policies.
At first glance, it might appear that the U.S. has given up on improving outcomes for historically marginalized racial and identity groups. Yet, some experts propose that these programs may continue, though perhaps rebranded to match the evolving political environment of a country that has recently chosen a leader focused on contesting “woke” policies.
The Roots of the Backlash
Programs resembling DEI first gained traction in the U.S. during the 1960s as a response to the civil rights movement, which aimed to broaden and safeguard the rights of Black Americans.
Originally described through terms like “affirmative action” and “equal opportunity,” these programs sought to address the enduring impacts of slavery and the institutional discrimination enforced under Jim Crow laws.
As social justice movements grew to include women’s rights, LGBTQ+ advocacy, and racial and ethnic diversity, the language associated with these endeavors expanded to cover “diversity,” “equity,” and “inclusion.”
In the realm of corporations and government bodies, DEI initiatives primarily concentrated on recruitment practices, portraying diversity as a financial benefit. Proponents claim that these programs tackle inequities across different communities, even though the focus has traditionally been on racial equity.
The drive for DEI escalated in 2020 during the Black Lives Matter demonstrations and rising calls for societal change. For example, Walmart committed $100 million over five years to create its Center for Racial Equity. Wells Fargo named its first chief diversity officer, while firms like Google and Nike already had similar positions established. As a result of these developments, S&P 100 companies generated over 300,000 new jobs, with 94% of them awarded to people of color, per Bloomberg.
Nonetheless, as rapidly as these initiatives grew, a conservative backlash arose.
Stefan Padfield, executive director of the conservative think tank National Center for Public Policy Research, argues that DEI programs fundamentally divide people along racial and gender lines.
More recently, critics have amplified their claims that DEI initiatives—initially intended to fight discrimination—are in themselves discriminatory, especially against white Americans. Sessions focusing on “white privilege” and systemic racial bias have faced significant criticism.
The roots of this opposition stem from conservative resistance to critical race theory (CRT), an academic framework that suggests racism is deeply embedded in American society. Over time, campaigns against CRT in schools evolved into broader efforts to penalize “woke corporations.”
Social media accounts like End Wokeness and conservative figures such as Robby Starbuck have capitalized on this sentiment, targeting companies for their DEI initiatives. Starbuck has claimed responsibility for policy shifts at companies like Ford, John Deere, and Harley-Davidson after exposing their DEI programs to his online followers.
One prominent success for this movement occurred in spring 2023, when Bud Light encountered significant backlash for collaborating with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney. Boycott calls targeting the brand and its parent firm, Anheuser-Busch, led to a 28% drop in Bud Light sales, according to an analysis by Harvard Business Review.
Another major turning point arrived in June 2023, when the Supreme Court ruled that race could no longer be a factor in university admissions, effectively dismantling decades of affirmative action policies.
This decision cast doubt on the legal standing of corporate DEI policies. Following the ruling, Meta informed employees that “the legal and policy landscape surrounding DEI has shifted,” just before announcing the cancellation of its own DEI programs.
Corporate Withdrawal: A Matter of Authenticity
The swift reversal of DEI initiatives among large corporations prompts questions regarding the genuineness of their dedication to workforce diversity.
Martin Whittaker, CEO of JUST Capital—a non-profit that surveys Americans on workplace matters—holds the view that many businesses initially adopted DEI initiatives to “appear favorable” following the Black Lives Matter movement, rather than from an authentic dedication to transformation.
Nonetheless, not all companies are yielding to political and legal pressure. A report by the conservative think tank Heritage Foundation noted that while DEI programs appear to be in decline, “nearly all” Fortune 500 companies still include DEI commitments somewhere in their official statements. Additionally, Apple shareholders recently voted to maintain the company’s diversity initiatives.
Public opinion on DEI remains divided. A survey by JUST Capital suggests that support for DEI has waned, but support for related issues—such as fair pay—remains strong. Similarly, a 2023 Pew Research Center survey found that a majority (56%) of employed adults still believe that workplace DEI efforts are beneficial.
